Creating a matrix of ones and zeros with location of ones based on array value

I need to acheive the following without a loop (for speed):
I have a vertical array where the value of each row tells me which column in a matrix of zeros should be replaced with a one.
For example, if I input:
y = [2; 3];
Then I want MATLAB to produce output:
Y = [0,1,0; 0, 0, 1];
I can acheive the desired output with the following for loop:
Y = zeros(2,3);
for j = 1:3
Y(:,j) = (y==j);
end
In reality, my matrices are much larger and I want to avoid using for loops for speed. Is there anyway I can do this without a for loop?

1 Comment

@ Melissa Moore :Are you interested in a faster solution still? If yes another solution can be proposed.

Sign in to comment.

 Accepted Answer

One possible way is:
Y = zeros(length(y), max(y));
Y(sub2ind(size(Y), (1:length(y))', y)) = 1;

More Answers (2)

The best solution I can think of is to use a for loop but will be faster than the one you showed because it will do one scalar assignment in each iteration compared to a vector assignment.
for j=1:2
Y(j,y(j)) = 1;
end
Timewise this is faster than the method propsed above by Kevin Rawson

1 Comment

A. Sawas, your method is faster for small arrays, but not for large arrays. I'm using your 10,000x10,000 example with y assigned to the diagonal (see code above).
Sawas method (run 10000 times):
tic;
for i=1:10000
for j=1:length(y)
Y(j,y(j)) = 1;
end
end;
toc;
%Elapsed time is 1.682664 seconds.
Rawson method (run 10000 times):
tic;
for i=1:10000
Y(ind2sub(1:length(y), y)) = 1;
end
toc;
%Elapsed time is 0.596671 seconds.

Sign in to comment.

I ended up doing this and it worked:
I = eye(3);
Y = I(y,:);

3 Comments

I would still argure that this solution is much slower than using the for loop as I showed.
y = (1:1e4)';
tic;
for i=1:length(y)
Y(i,y(i)) = 1;
end
toc;
%Elapsed time is 0.001051 seconds.
tic;
I = eye(length(y));
Y = I(y,:);
toc;
% Elapsed time is 0.741058 seconds.
Is Melissa's solution a valid solution?... IMO, I is a diagonal matrix where there are already existing 1's. And this is not what you want.
A. Sawas's is valid and more efficient.
Kevin Phung, as long as I = eye(max(y)), then Y = I(y,:) will return a valid solution.
However, as A. Sawas pointed out, this is an extremely slow operation, ~700 times slower than A. Sawas' method, and ~1988 times slower than my method for a 10,000x10,000 array.

Sign in to comment.

Categories

Find more on Loops and Conditional Statements in Help Center and File Exchange

Products

Release

R2018a

Tags

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!