Cannot find anonymous function

33 views (last 30 days)
Damien Watson
Damien Watson on 25 Nov 2025 at 10:40
Commented: dpb on 25 Nov 2025 at 17:10
I have an anonymous function that pulls out data from a table for use in an arrayfun. This looks something like (I have not been able to reproduce this error with a minimal example):
arrayfun(@(x)(any(myTable{i, "Column"}.(string(x)))), myArray)
This works fine most of the time, but occasionally, it will get to this line and throw the following error
Error using indexing
Cannot find function "@(x)(any(myTable{i, "Column"}.(string(x))))" in "MyClass.m".
Error in MyClass>@(x)(any(myTable{i, "Column"}.(string(x)))) (line ...)
arrayfun(@(x)(any(myTable{i, "Column"}.(string(x)))), myArray)
Once this error occurs, any future attempt to run this code fails with the same error. I have tried "clear all" and reloading the project. I noticed that I can run the code if I F9 it while at a breakpoint at the arrayfun line. The only workaround I have found is to restart MATLAB. This is not ideal though, as this error can occur quite a while into the code, wasting significant time. Is this a bug in MATLAB or am I doing something wrong/is there a better workaround? I am using R2022a.
  4 Comments
Damien Watson
Damien Watson on 25 Nov 2025 at 15:32
Edited: Damien Watson on 25 Nov 2025 at 15:34
My minimal example does not exhibit this behaviour, and all the anonymous functions in the rest of the codebase do not act like this, but here is the minimal example:
myTable = table(struct("a", {true; true; false}, "b", {false; true; false}), VariableNames="Column");
myArray = ["a", "b"];
for i = 1:height(myTable)
f = @(x)(any(myTable{i, "Column"}.(string(x))));
disp(arrayfun(f, myArray))
end
1 0 1 1 0 0
The error does not have any more details other than the unrelated stack.
I forgot to mention in my original post, but I did find this stack overflow thread on this issue from over a decade ago, with a broken link back to mathworks' website: How can matlab be unable to find an anonymous function? - Stack Overflow.
dpb
dpb on 25 Nov 2025 at 16:00
What if you passed the index as well as to the anonymous function? As is, it comes from the environment.
Code looks like it should work as is, but ...

Sign in to comment.

Accepted Answer

Damien Watson
Damien Watson on 25 Nov 2025 at 16:32
After looking at some other issues, I found a bug report (https://uk.mathworks.com/support/bugreports/details/2804253) that confirms this behaviour when using clear all/classes, which explains why I was unable to recreate this issue when I wasn't clearing. The suggested fix is to upgrade to 2023b+ or to use a workaround by using named functions instead of anonymous functions.
  1 Comment
dpb
dpb on 25 Nov 2025 at 17:10
" confirms this behaviour when using clear all/classes, ..."
clear all or clear classes is almost never required; and will reduce code efficiency. See the clear doc <Tips> on advice for specific conditions.

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (0)

Products


Release

R2022a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!