How to solve polynomial for a number of values x?

I have a data set with x and y values. (x=discharge and y = water level). Now I made a 3rd order polynomial fit and I need the value x given y for y = 0.00, 0.05, ..., 14.00 How do I solve the polynomial for x and get the x values in a nice matrix?
x = [5965 7867 9459 11763 13881 14794 16000 16619 20000] y = [3.7 6.34 7.04 7.89 8.61 8.91 9.25 9.42 10.19]
plot(x,y,'o')
[p,~,mu] = polyfit(x,y,3); y2 = polyval(p,x,[],mu); hold on plot(x,y2) hold off
h = [0.00:0.05:14.00]; %h are the values of y for which I want to know x
so the result should be a matrix like: [y1 x1 y2 x2 y3 x3 etc]
I'm only interested in real solutions

 Accepted Answer

x0=1;
for i=1:length(h)
X(i)=fzero(@(x)polyval(p,x)-h(i),x0);
x0=X(i)
end
Best wishes
Torsten.

3 Comments

That script works, however the values do not correspond with the initial data. Is this caused by my part of the script or something else?
Maybe you have to work with the scaled values:
X(i)=fzero(@(x)polyval(p,x,[],mu)-h(i),x0);
?
Best wishes
Torsten.
You, Sir, are my hero for today. Many thanks.

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (1)

Nothing personal, but that cubic polynomial is a relatively poor fit.
See that the cubic has some lack of fit, but that far more importantly, in extrapolation, it starts to do some nasty stuff, that does not seem indicated by your data.
Whereas, with essentially no options chosen at all, my SLM toolbox provides this result:
slm = slmengine(x,y,'plot','on','knots',[3000:3000:24000]);
Which seems to represent the data a bit more cleanly.
The inverse function is also easily done in one call to slmeval.

1 Comment

Can you explain how you achieved that? What is this slmengine ? I'm new to Matlab so I don't know about this
Edit: I've downloaded your slmengine package, will check if I can come to this fit.
Thanks anyways

Sign in to comment.

Categories

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!