Feedback requested: Proposed teaching architecture for control engineering (ACE-CORE)


I'd like to share some work from Controls Educator and long term collabortor @Dr James E. Pickering from Harper Adams University. He is currently developing a teaching architecture for control engineering (ACE-CORE) and is looking for feedback from the engineering community.
Early workings available at www.ace-lab.co.uk
ACE-CORE is delivered through ACE-Box, a modular hardware platform (Base + Sense, Actuate). More on the hardware here: What is the ACE-Box?
The Structure
(1) Comprehend
Learners build conceptual understanding of control systems by mapping block diagrams directly to physical components and signals. The emphasis is on:
  • Feedback architecture
  • Sensing and actuation
  • Closed-loop behaviour in practical terms
(2) Operate
Using ACE-Box (initially Base + Sense), learners run real closed-loop systems. The learners measure, actuate, and observe real phenomena such as: Noise, Delay, Saturation
Engineering requirements (settling time, overshoot, steady-state error, etc.) are introduced explicitly at this stage.
After completing core activities (e.g., low-pass filter implementation or PID tuning), the pathway branches (see the attached diagram)
(3a) Refine (Option 1) Students improve performance through structured tuning:
  • PID gains
  • Filter coefficients
  • Performance trade-offs
The focus is optimisation against defined engineering requirements.
(3b) Refine → Engineer (Option 2)
Modelling and analytical design become more explicit at this stage, including:
  • Mathematical modelling
  • Transfer functions
  • System identification
  • Stability analysis
  • Analytical controller design
Why the Branching?
The structure reflects two realities:
  • Engineers who operate and refine existing control systems
  • Engineers who design control systems through mathematical modelling
Your perspective would be very valuable:
  • Does this progression reflect industry reality?
  • Is the branching structure meaningful?
  • What blind spots do you see?
Constructive critique is very welcome. Thank you!

Tags

No tags entered yet.