Solution 11 by Alfonso crushes Java performance with a time of 0.014s for 1000!. Best use of base.
longer code but considerably faster non-java solution (0.05s for 1000!)
Solution 9 sees Alfonso step up and provide a concise method in the Best Factorial Solution in the Non-Java Category.
We don't need no steenkin' Java. :-)
Solution 6 is an expertly crafted non-java solution. Complexity Level- Outstanding. Time for 1000! vs Java ?
The convolution method is considerably slower than Java, which is what you would expect. For the java vs. non-java solutions:
Java - Elapsed time is 0.138064 seconds.
This case - Elapsed time is 1.039240 seconds.
Most nonzero elements in row
Replace NaNs with the number that appears to its left in the row.
Right Triangle Side Lengths (Inspired by Project Euler Problem 39)
04 - Scalar Equations 1
Pandiagonal Prime Magic Square Verification
REPMAT Enhancement - Faster for Large Row Replication of Vector
Unique: Enhanced Performance - Avoiding Memory Crash
Play Tic Tac Toe : No Losses Allowed
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: .
You can also select a web site from the following list:
Select the China site (in Chinese or English) for best site performance. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location.
Contact your local office