Virtual Design and Testing of an Autonomous Rescue Drone Speeds Up Product Development

Startup Builds Emergency Drone-Based Evacuation System


A hiker suffers a fall on a treacherous mountain. A family gets stranded in a flood-stricken area. Emergencies often happen in dangerous and unreachable locations. Traditional rescue methods can be slow and risky under such circumstances. This is what AVILUS, a Germany-based startup revolutionizing emergency response through autonomous drones, aims to address with Grille, its new rescue drone.

Equipped with advanced avionics and autonomous navigation systems, the drone carefully maneuvers through rugged terrain. Grille has a specialized patient box that can administer initial treatments and stabilize the patient during transport. This feature is crucial, especially in remote areas where the “golden hour”—the critical first hour after a traumatic injury—can dictate the chances of survival.

Drone Evacuation

AVILUS was founded by Ernst Rittinghaus and Ph.D. students of Professor Dr.-Ing. Florian Holzapfel’s Institute of Flight System Dynamics at the Technical University in Munich (TUM). The Ph.D. students, including Niclas Bähr, Max Söpper, and Daniel Dollinger, were working in the areas of flight controls, system architecture, and flight physics when Rittinghaus approached them with the need for a “flying stretcher.” In their free time, they developed a technical concept for the flying stretcher within one week.

“We don’t see our system as a replacement. We see it as an asset that works with traditional rescue means and personnel to assist in emergencies where systems are at their limits.”

“Ernst liked the concept so much that he said, ‘Let’s do this,’” Söpper, cofounder and CTO at AVILUS, says. “He wanted to build a prototype and demonstrate that such a scenario can work.”

The idea eventually evolved into the concept of drone-based evacuation systems, and the value proposition set the groundwork for AVILUS. Evacuation drones are invaluable in remote or hard-to-reach areas where the lack of infrastructure or challenging terrain hinders traditional rescue operations. The drones’ ability to navigate difficult landscapes quickly and efficiently makes them an ideal solution for delivering urgent medical care or evacuation services in such locations.

Drones also reduce safety risks since they are operated remotely and don’t need pilots or medical personnel to be on board or to enter potentially dangerous areas. This allows them to do more with less staffing.

Concept art of an AVILUS Grille drone with six coaxial rotors descending to a snow-covered mountain peak, toward a group of five people in winter gear squatting near the peak.

Concept art of an AVILUS Grille drone rescue mission in the mountains. (Image credit: AVILUS)

“Two people can operate 10 to 20 drones, compared to classical approaches where you have the surgeon and the pilot in the helicopter,” Söpper says. “We don’t see our system as a replacement. We see it as an asset that works with traditional rescue means and personnel to assist in emergencies where systems are at their limits.”

Building From Scratch

Going from concept to creation can be a long and challenging journey for technology companies. Like most startups, AVILUS started out very small. “In the beginning, we were a very small team of about five to eight people at the Institute of Flight Control System Dynamics,” Dollinger, cofounder and head of design, says. “We started with a blank sheet of paper and decided to build the drone from scratch.”

“We wanted to provide a drone with the capabilities of a rescue helicopter, but at a fraction of the price of a helicopter.”

Building the aircraft came with many challenges. The team needed to learn how to make the structure from carbon fiber and aluminum hybrid assembly. They also needed to gain a lot of knowledge on building the vehicle’s electrical powertrain. And they had to do everything on a limited startup budget.

Starting with a blank slate ensured that the vehicle could meet the precise needs of rescue teams without the compromises that might come from adapting existing vehicles. By adopting a minimalist design, they could also cut the costs and time of production considerably.

“We wanted to provide a drone with the capabilities of a rescue helicopter, but at a fraction of the price of a helicopter,” Dollinger says.

From the initial concept of a rescue drone, the product has evolved into a full rescue system named DRONEVAC©, consisting of the MEDEVAC evacuation UAVs, or Grille drones, a mobile ground station, and further equipment.

Video length is 0:20

An AVILUS Grille drone in flight. (Video credit: AVILUS)

Model-Based Design

One of the keys to the success of the AVILUS team was adopting Model-Based Design, a methodology that uses simulation by using modeling tools to design and analyze systems before they are fully built. Model-Based Design allows engineers to create, test, and iterate systems within a virtual environment, significantly streamlining the development process from conceptual design through implementation and testing.

“We use Simulink to develop simulation models for our aircraft so that in the end, we can do the full model-in-the-loop simulation of all its systems, subsystems, and components together with the flight control algorithms represented in the corresponding components of the aircraft.”

This design method allowed the AVILUS team to perform simulations and functional tests even before all the physical components were ready. They used System Composer™ to develop and test the physical and functional system architecture. This early testing helped identify and resolve potential issues without the need to build physical prototypes repeatedly.

Simscape™ was used for detailed models of the subsystems, including the electric powertrain with battery, intermediate circuit, inverter, and engine.

The team also used Simulink® to develop flight control algorithms and the overall simulation models of the aircraft, which enabled them to test and validate the entire aircraft system in a simulated environment. This approach ensured that the system’s behavior was well-understood and optimized before moving to more costly and time-consuming physical tests.

“We use Simulink to develop simulation models for our aircraft so that in the end, we can do the full model-in-the-loop simulation of all its systems, subsystems, and components together with the flight control algorithms represented in the corresponding components of the aircraft,” Dollinger says. “We have a set of requirements for the development of the functions from which we create test cases, and these test cases are then run in the model-in-the-loop simulation in Simulink.”

AVILUS significantly reduced development time and costs by using Model-Based Design. The model-in-the-loop simulations in Simulink were so effective that they reduced the additional verification effort needed during real hardware tests to between 5–10%.

“From a systems perspective, all the software components in our closed-loop Simulink simulation model and the test cases are enough to automatically assess all the effects when we introduce changes in the system,” Dollinger says. “In the end, it’s like checking the box that you also did hardware-in-the-loop simulations because, in most cases, the difference between the model-in-the-loop and the hardware is very small.”

Hardware Tests

The use of Model-Based Design and MATLAB® made it easier to perform the hardware-in-the-loop tests. The team used Embedded Coder® to transform the Simulink models from high-level algorithms into low-level C code that could run on the drones’ embedded processors.

The use of Model-Based Design and MATLAB® made it easier to perform the hardware-in-the-loop tests. The team used Embedded Coder® to transform the Simulink models from high-level algorithms into low-level C code that could run on the drones’ embedded processors.

“We usually start on an interface database, which is then used to create a Simulink model template with input and output ports based on your physical system architecture,” Dollinger says. “When we implement our algorithm, this template model becomes the design model. From this design model, we generate the code and then integrate it into our embedded framework based on the hardware we have.”

During hardware-in-the-loop testing, the real-time system generates synthetic sensor data, representing what the sensors would perceive during an actual flight. This data is fed to the hardware components being tested, such as the flight control computer, to see how they react to various flight scenarios.

After the hardware-in-the-loop tests, the team conducted “tethered flights,” which involved securing the aircraft to a pole that allowed the vehicle to move up and down without full airborne risks. This setup provided a safe environment to test the aircraft’s behavior under near-real conditions without the full risk of free flight. After that, the system was ready for full flight tests.

Diagram of the DRONEVAC rescue system consisting of the MEDEVAC UAV Grille, the ground control segment within the patient evacuation coordination cell, the trailer for operations and logistics from which the drone can take off and land, and the digital backbone connecting all components.

Model of the DRONEVAC rescue system. (Image credit: AVILUS)

"When we started the first free flight of our fully assembled aircraft, it was a very emotional moment for all of us,” Dollinger says. “Since then, we have gathered a lot of flight hours.”

Accelerating Innovation

AVILUS has already delivered its first product, the Grille drone. But it has not stopped its research and development. Thanks to the design process the AVILUS team created, they are rapidly improving their vehicles and shipping new ones.

“The great thing about Model-Based Design is that it’s easy to make changes to the model because we’ve already set up the processes and toolchains,” Söpper says. “We have built up the processes, the tool structure, and the team to do the same thing again for new design iterations. We expect that our second product will take only one-fifth the time than our first since we can leverage existing models.”

“The great thing about Model-Based Design is that it’s easy to make changes to the model because we’ve already set up the processes and toolchains. We have built up the processes, the tool structure, and the team to do the same thing again for new design iterations. We expect that our second product will take only one-fifth the time than our first since we can leverage existing models.”

The team is currently flight-testing their second unmanned aircraft and has started building a third one with additional functionalities. However, building every new aircraft becomes faster and easier as the team continues to expand its tool base and automate the design, test, and deployment process.

“Now we have all these experiences and have integrated the system that accounts for 80% of the challenging work,” Söpper says.

However, the AVILUS team’s biggest takeaway from this design approach is the improved process for learning and innovation as a startup, especially one in a highly regulated and sensitive industry.

An AVILUS Grille drone in flight shown from below.

An AVILUS Grille drone in flight. (Image credit: AVILUS)

“The classic development model, where you define all requirements from the very beginning, isn’t the best approach with projects like this because the customer’s operational concept changes or grows over time,” Söpper says. “So, the builder and the customer need to work together and learn from each other as operational needs emerge and product development evolves.”


Read Other Stories

Panel Navigation

AEROSPACE

Pilotless Helicopters Deliver Large Payloads with Precision

Autonomous Helicopter Startup Tests Prototype for Drone Deliveries

Panel Navigation
Panel Navigation

ROBOTICS

A Platoon of Green Autonomous Vehicles on Railroad Tracks

Battery-Powered Rail Cars Move Freight Cleaner, Faster, and Safer