Try to use "unique(floor(..." in the test cases. Isn't it Alfonso?? ;-)
This problem is quite well constructed and described. However, per the WP article linked to, it is important to specify two additional requirements: 〔1〕 Denominators must be positive. This is not explicitly mentioned in the Problem Statement [although perhaps it's implied], and moreover it's not checked in the Test Suite. That means 3/4 = 1/(1) + 1/(-4) would be erroneously accepted. 〔2〕 Each of the denominators must be different/unique. That is enforced in the Test Suite, but there's no mention of it in the Problem Statement. —DIV
Can't submit a solution to this problem (temporary unavailability of MATLAB Service).
Sorry this is not the solution. Output is not an integer
Time to update the test suite again...
I'm always happy to have a learning opportunity
While this meets the letter of the problem requirements, it clearly violates the spirit. I recommend using "unique(denom = egyptian_fraction(Vmin,Vmax));" to prevent this.
Please resubmit your solution; previous test suite was buggy.
The Goldbach Conjecture, Part 2
Back to basics 8 - Matrix Diagonals
I Plead the Fifth
Who am I ?
All Humans are Created Equal - Pareto Equality
Numbers at bit-boundary
Reduce - Map-Reduce
Greed is good - Simple partition P[n].
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: .
You can also select a web site from the following list:
Select the China site (in Chinese or English) for best site performance. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location.
Contact your local office